Sanctions (and embargos) are an act of war. The revisionist effort to change the meaning of words doesn't change the words, only the perception. There are few statesmen opposing the collectivist politicians in government these days. Does anyone really believe that sanctions are not an act of war? Statists are likely to say no, but those of us who study history, foreign policy, and economics know better. Anyone care to argue the statist view?
Sanctions against Iran Are an act of war
No comments:
Post a Comment